Susan Healy Maryland

Md. GOP lawmakers hold out on debt deal

Maryland’s two Republican members of Congress were once again hedging their bets Monday over the latest deal to raise the nation’s $14.3 trillion debt ceiling, with Rep. Andy Harris saying he’s “leaning against” the proposal and Rep. Roscoe G. Bartlett noting that he’s “technically undecided.”

The proposal, which would cut $917 billion in spending over a decade to extend the debt ceiling through the end of the year, could come up for a vote in the House on Monday – a day before the deadline to raise the debt ceiling or risk default. Democrats say a Senate vote will take place after the House acts.

Harris, of Baltimore County, was one of the first conservatives to tie his support for raising the debt ceiling to a proposed constitutional amendment that would require Washington to balance the federal budget. On Monday, Harris said he was concerned that “the linkage to the balanced budget amendment isn’t strong enough” in the deal worked out between the White House and congressional leaders over the weekend. “There’s not enough reason for someone to vote for” the amendment, he said.

Harris, who represents the Eastern Shore, nevertheless predicted the measure would pass.

Both Harris and Bartlett were among the final holdouts of the original proposal put forward by Speaker John Boehner last week. Both came on board – and ultimately voted for that bill – when Republicans leaders added the balanced budget amendment to the legislation. That bill was promptly tabled by the Senate.

The most recent version only requires a vote on the budget amendment.

What’s less clear is how some of Maryland’s Democrats feel about the 11th-hour deficit-reduction deal, particularly Rep. Donna F. Edwards, a Prince George’s County lawmaker who has increasingly positioned herself as a progressive leader. A spokesman for Edwards did not return a request for comment. (1). Prosecute, eliminate “MURDER- fraud- crime- injustice networks”= cruel tyranny= robbery machine = ROBBER- ISM; destroying essences of democracy, capitalism; continuing, on-going; relaying, penetrating every segment of our lives (inc. civic non- profit organizations); expanding here domestically to overseas- foreign countries; with threat, coercion, victimization, deprivation, discrimination; unjust practices, manipulation, influence; bad legislative bills; unjust hidden agenda with false/ misleading excuses (inc. private- public partnership, economic development, housing, school construction, transportation, abandonment of properties, maintenance of “paper roads”, nonsense grants, programs; …, whatever) to benefit/ facilitate “MURDER-fraud- crime- injustice networks” (inc. officials, judges, developers, lawyers, employees, etc.); expand further unjust operation; endless unlawful- immoral acts; rob/destruct resources (rights, land, properties, home, buildings, assets, accounts, income, pension, documents, evidences; public, private; business, civic, political); frivolous litigation, levies, foreclosures, garnishment, guardianship, power of attorney; improper processing of complaints, procedures, proceedings, docketing, bookkeeping, accounting; cause vicious cycles: socio- political- election-media- budget- legislative- system problems; civil-human rights backwards; people-slave. Examples of problems are provided below: ** (2). Restore: principle, fairness, cost-effectiveness, accountability, reliability, capability; fair election, justice, peace (including civic, non-profit organizations), “check and balance”; Restore: TRUE essence of democracy, fair election process; easy access to government, files, records, transcripts; not unjustly manipulated, influenced, misled by wrong person, information, or “official misconduct- government gang- fraud- crime- injustice networks” = serious causes of socio- political – election –media- budget- legislative problems, which destroy people, families, society, peace, justice, democracy. Based on merits, justification; NO double standards, improper processing of complaints, procedures, proceedings; falsification, false records, tampering of evidence, data; harassment, intimidation (complainant, witnesses); false charges, citation, bond, imprisonment; disparities and improper treatments, etc.; abuse of laws, power, authorities. (3). Promote democracy, fair election, quality, competition, people input (policies, issues, officials, judges); televise public hearings, citizen/candidate forum/debate; maintain, disseminate meaningful accurate information, records, capability, reasoning, good sense of justice, public interest, endurance. Objective screening by meaningful rigorous examinations, evaluations for quality, capability, endurance and public interest. * To capture extended serious problems of “MURDER-fraud- crime- injustice networks” with official misconduct- government gang, please incorporate the following: (A). complaints/ cases: administrative and judicial levels; (B) frequent testimonies before government bodies, official, legislators, law enforcement, committees, public hearings; local – federal; (C) spin-off complaints, improper processing of complaints, procedures, proceedings, accounting, bookkeeping, docketing, etc.; (D) Candidate statements, see Webs and archives. Urge to re-open and investigate Congress.org, DNet (by League of Women Voters), links, etc.; (E) complaints and reports to police, law enforcement, consumer affairs, other authorities/agencies against “fraud- crime- injustice networks”; (F). Numerous TV programs on social issues (Dr. Lih Young: producer, host, speaker).

Bernadine Healy, MD: Remembering a Pioneering Health Hero ...

As we weep a flitting of Bernadine Healy , M.D., a universe remembers a health hero, a idealist personality and a colonize for women and women’s health. Dr. Healy died Saturday as a outcome of complications from cancer. She was usually 67.

I had a respect and payoff of operative with Dr. Healy in her caring purpose as a initial lady executive of a National Institutes of Health (NIH). There, she was a bold champion and a source of inspiration. In 1991, as NIH director, she set a new march for a NIH, building a vital devise for a agency. It was her prophesy that led to a recruitment of a world-renowned group of experts to conduct a Human Genome Project and a investiture of a new National Institute on Nursing Research. She also spearheaded a landmark Women’s Health Initiative, a “mother of all clinical trials,” a $625 million investigate conducted in some-more than 40 sites national to investigate diseases in post-menopausal women as good as strategies to foster a healthier future. The largest clinical hearing ever conducted, this investigate was also a initial impending investigate on hormone deputy therapy ensuing in a sea change in how these drugs are used today. Dr. Healy also promoted a career growth of women in scholarship and medicine.

For me, Bernadine’s brilliance, wisdom, passion, loyalty, unifying meditative and eagerness to assistance others mount out a many in my memory. In 1992, Dr. Healy allocated me as Chair of a NIH Health and Behavior Coordinating Committee and as a Special Assistant to assistance her with a reorder of a National Institutes of Health to strengthen a Nation’s investigate bulletin by a formation of ADAMHA’s 3 investigate institutes — a National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, a National Institute on Drug Abuse, and a National Institute of Mental Health — into a NIH. The result: a NIH got a “head” back, and this noted a commencement of a “Decade of a Brain” that has resulted in an blast of investigate advances in neurology, mental illness, and piece abuse disorders to a advantage of millions of patients in a United States and around a world. It also fostered larger bargain of a purpose of behavioral factors in a cause, diagnosis and impediment of all diseases needing us to improved gain on these perspectives in fighting vital pandemics such as AIDS and obesity. This cross-cutting proceed among institutes became a model for many destiny NIH investigate initiatives. For many years, we worked with Dr. Healy to redress a inequities in women’s health care. And when in 1993, we was allocated a initial Deputy Assistant Secretary for Women’s Health to coordinate research, services, and impediment activities opposite a agencies of a US Department of Health and Human Services, including a NIH, CDC, and FDA, Dr. Healy told me how unapproachable she was of this appointment and of a accomplishments of my bureau in advancing women’s health. And her comment was so really suggestive to me. Most recently, we worked together on a Commission of a Center for a Study of a Presidency and Congress that constructed a roadmap for destiny directions in health and medicine. Her vicious contributions framed many of a recommendations of this report.

Risk Management Techniques in Perinatal and Neonatal Practice

The Rand McNally bankers directory

Psychological abstracts

Women lawyers' journal

The Medical directory ..., London, provinces, Wales, Scotland, Ireland, abroad, navy, army & air force